It's a bird, it's a plane, it's

Everything here is my opinion. I do not speak for your employer.
"Assume all your co-workers are making smart decisions
I like this idea of so-called "gradual typing":

2015-01-06 »

Tested my new wifi autochannel algorithm on 2.4 GHz in a noisy office.  Most of the routers in the room were on channels 1, 6, or 11, but there were at least a couple of outliers on every single channel (this is New York after all).

Anyway, my algorithm picked channel 2.  Conventional wisdom is that this is exactly wrong, because it is a partial overlap with channel 1.  Sadly, I double checked the math, and it checks out.  It may have actually made the right decision for a very complex situation, assuming my algorithm makes sense at all.

I'm pretty sure this is how it will feel when the machines take over.

Meanwhile, I guess I should just do a speedtest on every single channel and do this objectively.

I'm CEO at Tailscale, where AI runs on us, not the other way around.

You can find me on Bluesky. Or subscribe with RSS.

apenwarr on gmail.com